University Place Chiropractic new york city new york
Chiropractor New York City click here to learn more about chiropractors Drs Randi and Archer Irbychiropractor new york city chiropractic services specializing in spinal decompression therapyNew York Chiropractor learn more about our chiropratic serviceschiropractor new york city chiropractic services specializing in spinal decompression therapyChiropractors in New York City learn more about our spinal decompression serviceschiropractor new york city chiropractic services specializing in spinal decompression therapyNew York City Chiropractors learn more about the symptoms we treat with chiropracticchiropractor new york city chiropractic services specializing in spinal decompression therapyChiropractors in New York City see what our chiropractic patients say about our spinal decompression serviceschiropractor new york city chiropractic services specializing in spinal decompression therapyNew York City Chiropractos see what questions about chiropractic our clients ask us  
 

L
C
D

R
E
S
E
A
R
C
H

Efficacy of VAX-D on chronic low back pain: Study of dosage regimen
Gustavo Ramos M.D., Department of Neurology and Radiology

Rio Grande Regional Hospital, McAllen Texas
(page four of six)

Table 2: Frequency Distribution of Response

Response Diagnosis - Confirmed by Diagnostic Imagining
20 Sessions 10 Sessions
Cases % Cases %
Remission 39 76.5 39 42.9
Partial Remission 10 19.6 22 24.1
Negative 2 3.9 30 32.9
Total Cases 51 0 91

Table 3 shows the responses classed conservatively into two categories Remission and Not-Remission. For this purpose " Not-Remission " includes all cases classed as both Partial Responses and Negative Responses. The difference between the two dosage groups was found to be highly significant with a p < 0.0002.

Table 3: Frequency Distribution of Response

Response Diagnosis - Confirmed by Diagnostic Imagining
20 Sessions 10 Sessions
Cases % Cases %
Remission 39 76.5 39 42.9
Not Remission* 12 23.5 52 57.1
Total Cases 51 0 91


*Not-Remission = ( Partial Remission + Negative response )
Chi-Square = 19.14 p < .0002 @ df 1

The 20 Sessions group achieved a statistically significant: 1. Higher remission rate 2. Lower failure rate

Analysis of the Remission rate and Not-Remission rate was then subjected to null hypothesis as shown in Tables 4 and 5. "Null hypothesis" employs a stringent criteria based on the concept that if the procedure has no effect the frequency distribution would be equal between categories of response. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the observed frequency distribution and a normal binomial distribution.

Table 4 shows the responses classed as Remission and Not-Remission, for the 20 Sessions group compared to a null hypothesis distribution. Chi- Square analysis of this data concludes that the Remission rate in the 20 Sessions group was statistically significant with a p < 0.01.

Table 5. shows the responses classed as Remission and Not-Remission, for the 10 Sessions group compared to a null hypothesis distribution. Chi- Square analysis of this data was not statistically significant with a p > 0.3 .

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

return to LCD Research page

website design by Imagine Web Designs Copyright 2006 All Rights Reserved University Place Chiropractic New York, New York
Home | About Drs. | Chiro Services | LCD | Symptoms | Testimonials | Faq | Contact | Sitemap