A Prospective Randomized Controlled study of VAX-D and TENS for the
Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
(page five of five)
Although the mechanism of action may not be fully understood the thixotrophic (17) properties of the nucleus material may facilitate nuclear migration toward the centre of the disc under negative pressures created by VAX-D.
It has been shown experimentally that elevated lactate levels and low pH in the disc prohibit disc proteoglycan synthesis and accelerates matrix degeneration (18).
Destruction of the proteoglycan matrix and fluid retention properties can lead to a degenerative cascade with loss of cellular reparative functions and vitality. The reduction of intradiscal pressures may enhance the diffusion gradient across the endplate into the avascular disc. It has been postulated that mechanisms that facilitate oxygen and nutrient uptake in the disc may exert a beneficial effect on the metabolism and restorative functions.
Successful reduction of intradiscal pressures with VAX-D therapy represents a technological advance in lumbar spinal treatment and is likely to affect both the biomechanical and biochemical causes of discogenic pain. The results from this study demonstrate that VAX-D is an effective treatment for the management of patients with chronic low back pain and is significantly superior when compared to TENS therapy. Analysis of the data demonstrated an attributable success rate of 68.4% for VAX-D. These findings are consistent with earlier studies by Gose E, Naguszewski W, Naguszewski R. (14)
The results of this prospective study demonstrated that VAX-D can achieve a statistically significant improvement in pain and functional outcome in managing patients suffering from disc related chronic low back pain.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Australian National Musculoskeletal Initiative: For advice and instruction on the use of instruments for the outcome measures used in the present study.
Jane Ambrose, Biostatistician Quintiles: For statistical analysis of the data.
DISCLOSURE
Dr Russell Smart is contracted to and a shareholder in VAX-D Australasia Pty Ltd, a private company that delivers VAX-D service in Australia.
REFERENCES
1. Von Korff M. Studying the natural history of back pain. Spine 1994; 19(18 Suppl): 2041S-2046S.
2. Von Korff M., Saunders J. The course of back pain in primary care. Spine 1996; 21: 2833-2837.
3. Klenerman L, Slade, PD Stanley IM. et al. The prediction of chronicity in patients with an acute attack of low back pain in general practice setting. Spine 1995; 20:478-484.
4. Bogduk N, Evidence Based Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain; The National Musculoskeletal Medicine Initiative NHMRC;Nov 1999
5. Hirsch C. An attempt to diagnose the level of disc lesion clinically by disc puncture. Acta Orthop Scand 1948;18:132-140
6. Smythe MJ. and Wright V. Sciatica and the intervertebral disc. An experimental study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1958;40:1401-1418
7. Falconer MA; McGeorge M, Begg AC; Observations on the cause and mechanism of symptom production in sciatica and low back pain. J Neuro Neurosurg Psychiatry 1948;11:13-26
8. Murphy F. Experience with lumbar disc. Clin Nerurosurg 1973;20:1-8
9. Wiberg G. Back pain in relation to the nerve supply of the intervertebral disc. Acta Orthop Scand 1950;19:211-221
10. Kublisch S, Ulstrom C, Michael C. The Tissue of Low Back Pain and Sciatica: A Report of Pain Response to Tissue Stimulation During Operations on the Lumbar Spine Using Local Anesthesia. Orth Clinics of North Am 1991; 22:181-187
11. Ramos G, and Martin W. Effects of vertebral axial decompression on intradiscal pressure. J. Neurosurg 1994; 81: 350-353.
12. Anderson G, Schultz A, Nachemson A. L. Intervertebral Disc Pressures During Traction. Scand J Rehabil Supp 1983; 9:88-91
13. Tilaro F, Miskovich D. The Effects of Vertebral Axial Decompression On Nerve Sensory Dysfunction; Can J of Clinical Medicine 1999 Vol 6 No 1: 2-7
14. Gose E, Naguszewski W, Naguszewski R. Vertebral axial decompression therapy for pain associated with herniated or degenerated discs or facet syndrome: An Outcome Study. J Neurological Research 1998 Vol 20:186-190.
15. Bogduk N. Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine and Sacrum. Third Edition. Churchill Livingstone 1997.
16. Fujita K, Nakagawa T, Hirabayashi K, Nagai Y. Neutral Proteinases in Human Intervertebral Disc. Role in Degeneration and Probable Origin. Spine 1993; 18:1766-1773
17. Nachemson A. Elfstrom G. Intravital Dynamic Pressure Measurements in Lumbar Discs. Scand J. Rehabil Med (Supp) 1970; 1:4-40
18. Matsui Y, Macda M, Nakagami W, Iwata H. The Involvement of Matrrix Metalloproteinases and Inflammation in Lumbar Disc Herniation. Spine 1998; 23:863-69
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
return to LCD Research page